<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Conservative Blogger</title>
        <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:22:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Happy 233rd Birthday, USMC!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ega.gif" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/ega.gif" width="200" height="209" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span><div>My grandfather, whom I never knew, fought in both World Wars wearing the uniform of the United States Marine Corps.  In World War I, he drove a tank under Patton. During World War II, he was a part of the atomic tests at Bikini Atoll in the Pacific.  After the war, he returned to D.C where he was assigned to the Bureau of Ships. Eventually, he would retire from the United States Marine Corps with the rank of Major.</div><div><br /></div><div>My father was a Gunnery Sergeant long before I was born. I know he spent time at Camp Lejeune, NC and eventually served in Korea but, ultimately, my father never wanted to talk about his time in Korea.  During my life, he spent most of his free time working with the <a href="http://www.mcleague.org">Marine Corps League</a> and did various fund raising drives, community outreach and even helped coordinate <a href="http://www.toysfortots.org">Toys for Tots</a> in our local area.</div><div><br /></div><div>I've had a respect and affinity for the United States Marine Corps my entire life--and that respect is a direct result of the Marines I've known in my lifetime.</div><div><br /></div><div>First and also "First to Fight."  Happy Birthday, Marines! </div><div><br /></div><div>SEMPER FI!</div><div> </div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/happy_233rd_birthday_usmc.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/happy_233rd_birthday_usmc.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">USMC</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Marines</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">USMC</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:22:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>It&apos;s the Economy, Stupid...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Before results even started coming in last night, the networks telegraphed what they had been sitting on all day long.<div><br /></div><div>The "breaking news" headlines on all of the websites for the major news outlets said something to the effect of "voters upset about the economy."  </div><div><br /></div><div>Several weeks ago, I said that I though this election would turn out more like 1992 than 1980. '92 was completely about the economy and Bill Clinton won the presidency on the back of four words, "It's the economy, stupid."</div><div><br /></div><div>Before the votes were even counted last night, I knew who would win.  The only uncertainty would be the margin of victory.  John McCain never stood a chance.</div><div><br /></div><div>So, now we are faced with President-Elect Barack Obama.  Clearly, to quote an email from my friend Ken Gorrell, "We've just elected the most liberal President with the weakest resume in history."</div><div><br /></div><div>The campaign to hold Barack Obama accountable for 2012 starts now.  <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">ObamaWatch.us</span> is coming soon...</div><div> </div><div>More post-election analysis later today...</div><div> </div><div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/its_the_economy_stupid.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/its_the_economy_stupid.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 07:47:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>LIVE 2008 ELECTION NIGHT COVERAGE...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Join me this coming Tuesday for the Election Night Live Blog beginning at 7:00pm EST and running late into the evening.&nbsp; I'll be blogging from downtown Manchester, New Hampshire at <a href="http://www.murphystaproom.net/">Murphy's Taproom on Elm Street</a>.</p>
<p>Be a part of the coverage as America elects the 44th President of the United States, Tuesday, November 4th!&nbsp; </p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<hr>

<p></p>
<p><a onclick="window.open('http://www.conservativeblogger.com/electoral.htm', 'popup', 'width=600,height=600'); return false" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/electoral.htm" target="popup"><strong><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">VIEW THE CONSERVATIVE BLOGGER LIVE POP-UP ELECTORAL MAP!</font></strong></a><strong><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"> </font></strong></p>
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font><strong></strong></p><strong><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">
<hr>
</font></strong>
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font></p>
<p><strong><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font></strong></p>
<p><strong><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=f960594a71/height=550/width=470" frameborder="0" width="470" scrolling="no" height="550"></iframe></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/announcing_the_election_night.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/11/announcing_the_election_night.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Live Blog</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Live Blog</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:51:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Democrats are Coming for Your 401(k)...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="socialistYWC.gif" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/socialistYWC.gif" width="166" height="260" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span><div>Have you looked at the value of your 401(k) retirement account recently?</div><div><br /></div><div>If you're anything like me, you probably haven't.  You don't want to see the uncontrollable hemorrhaging going on with the money you're saving for your retirement someday.</div><div><br /></div><div>I logged in the other morning to make my selections for my annual benefits enrollment and saw the percentage loss for the year.</div><div><br /></div><div>45%.</div><div><br /></div><div>Nearly half of the money I've been setting aside for my eventual retirement is just <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">gone</span>.  I've been contributing into this plan for thirteen years and nearly half of my contributions have evaporated right into thin air.</div><div><br /></div><div>To add gross insult to critical injury, House Democrats now want to add new <a href="http://grizzlygroundswell.com/2008/10/31/401ks-in-jeopardy/">taxes to your retirement money</a>.</div><div><br /></div><div>From <a href="http://www.investmentnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081012/REG/310139971&amp;template=printart">Investment News</a>: </div><div><br /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">Powerful House Democrats are eyeing proposals to overhaul the nation's $3 trillion 401(k) system, including the elimination of most of the $80 billion in annual tax breaks that 401(k) investors receive.</blockquote><div><div><br /></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">House Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., and Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support, are looking at redirecting those tax breaks to a new system of guaranteed retirement accounts to which all workers would be obliged to contribute.</blockquote><div><div><br /></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">A plan by Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic-policy analysis at The New School for Social Research in New York, contains elements that are being considered. She testified last week before Mr. Miller's Education and Labor Committee on her proposal.<br /><br />[...]</blockquote><div><div><br /></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">"I want to stop the federal subsidy of 401(k)s," Ms. Ghilarducci said in an interview. "401(k)s can continue to exist, but they won't have the benefit of the subsidy of the tax break."<br /><br />[...]</blockquote><div><div><br /></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">"I want to spend our nation's dollar for retirement security better. Everybody would now be covered" if the plan were adopted, Ms. Ghilarducci said.</blockquote><div><div><br /></div></div><div>Did you catch that?  Now the federal tax break on saving <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">your own money</span> for <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">your own retirement</span></span> is a "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">federal subsidy</span></span>."</div><div><br /></div><div>You know, I'm <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">not</span> one of the "wealthiest Americans." I don't make $250,000.00 or more every year.  Barack Obama said that my taxes "wouldn't go up a dime" in his Administration.  Yet, if I choose to save for my own retirement and attempt to lighten the burden on Social Security, I'm penalized with higher taxes and <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">then</span> that money is given to others who <span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">didn't</span> save for their retirement for whatever reason.  </div><div><br /></div><div>It's a behemoth Universal Socialized Retirement System and it's coming to you courtesy of the Democrats in Washington.</div><div><br /></div><div>From <a href="http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/oct/31/why-do-democrats-want-your-401k/">RedState</a>:</div><div><br /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; ">It's no surprise that liberals in Congress want to take over control of a little more of your hard-earned wages, but it's instructive to listen to why. This is what Chairman George Miller had to say during <a href="http://edwork.edgeboss.net/wmedia/edwork/fc/fc100708.wvx" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; color: rgb(51, 102, 153); text-decoration: none; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: rgb(51, 102, 153); ">the recent commitee hearing</a> that examined the idea:</span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px;"><br /></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">With respect to the 401k, it appears to be a plan that is not really well-devised for the changes in the market. We load an awful lot onto the back of the individual - and I've been to more seminars and conferences where they ask for more and more education about savings and investing. We keep asking this person to get smarter and smarter about their savings and that's sort of it and they're on their own...</span></span></blockquote></blockquote><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; "><blockquote style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; "><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; ">Barack Obama and the Democrats are<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">n't</span> going after the rich, folks. They're going after anyone <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/10/30/why-democrats-will-target-the-investor-class-in-2009.html" style="text-decoration: underline; ">who chooses to invest their own money</a> and provide for themselves.  They don't think you can be trusted with your own money and they wantyou to suckle on the Government teat as much as humanly possible.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;">Is this the "change" you're signing up for?  Socialism??</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-size: 13px; line-height: normal;"><br /></span></div></blockquote></span></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_democrats_are_coming_for_y.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_democrats_are_coming_for_y.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Democrats</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Senate/House</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">401(k)</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Congress</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Democrats</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">House</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Taxes</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:15:30 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Buckeye Institute Files State RICO Action Against ACORN</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By way of newsworthy items this afternoon, there is this development out of Ohio regarding <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/10142008/news/politics/bogus_voter_booted_amid_probe_of_acorn_133540.htm">ACORN</a>--the community organization that <a href="http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/elections/article852295.ece">has been engaging</a> in <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1223973289273860.xml&amp;coll=2">rampant voter fraud</a>:</p><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif">
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>COLUMBUS - The Buckeye Institute, a Columbus-based think tank, today filed a state RICO action against the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) on behalf of two Warren County voters.&nbsp; The action filed in Warren County Court of Common Pleas alleges ACORN has engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity that amounts to organized crime.&nbsp; It seeks ACORN's dissolution as a legal entity, the revocation of any licenses in Ohio, and an injunction against fraudulent voter registration and other illegal activities.</p>
<p>Plaintiffs Jennifer Miller of Mason, Ohio and Kimberly Grant of Loveland, allege that ACORN's actions deprive them of the right to participate in an honest and effective elections process.&nbsp; They allege fraudulent voter registrations submitted by ACORN dilute the votes of legally registered voters.</p>
<p>"The right to cast a vote that is not diluted by fraudulent votes is a fundamental individual right," Buckeye Institute President David Hansen said.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr">A full copy of the complaint can be seen <a href="http://www.buckeyeinstitute.org/acorn.pdf">here</a>.</p></span>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/buckeye_institute_files_state.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/buckeye_institute_files_state.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">ACORN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ACORN</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">voter fraud</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:01:23 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>My 5th Blogiversary!!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[ <div><br /></div><div>Where <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">does</span> the time go?</div><div><br /></div><div>Five years ago, I started Conservative Blogger because I was tired--tired of the bias of cable news and Corporate Media; tired of feeling like I was on an island; tired of feeling like my voice just wasn't being heard. </div><div><br /></div><div>I had heard about blogging and, while I didn't know much about it, I figured it was the best way to exercise my First Amendment rights. So, that weekend, I registered a domain and signed up for a hosting plan and began writing my blog.  I was so new to the medium that I wasn't even using a content management system.  I was manually constructing each page using Microsoft Front Page and I would FTP it up to my server space.</div><div><br /></div><div>My first real entry, "<a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2003/10/in_defense_of_rush_limbaugh.php">In Defense of Rush Limbaugh...</a>," had an initial readership of about twenty people--and that's only because that's how many people I had sent it to in email.  Some thought it interesting...some found it laughable...some even asked me, "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">What the hell is a blog, anyway</span>?" </div><div><br /></div><div>At the time, there were not as many political blogs as there are today and there certainly weren't any blogs on national politics originating from New Hampshire.  As far as I can tell, I was one of the first (if not <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">the</span> first) in the Granite State.  </div><div><br /></div><div>Since 2003, I've felt really fortunate to see this blog grow.  I'm certainly not the biggest or the most-read blog in the blogosphere, and I'm OK with that.  Despite my seemingly endless ego on these pages, "shameless self-promotion" has never really been something I've excelled at. It's become easier in some ways with applications like <a href="http://www.twitter.com/conblog" style="text-decoration: underline; ">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.new.facebook.com/people/William_Smith/505155282" style="text-decoration: underline; ">Facebook</a>, and I've seen a corresponding rise in unique visitors since incorporating these into my blog.</div><div><br /></div><div><hr></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Conservative Blogger: The First Five Years...</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="masts.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/masts.jpg" width="496" height="567" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></div><div><hr></div><div><br /></div><div>To celebrate my fifth blogiversary, I asked Mel at <a href="http://www.emtwowebstudios.com/">Emtwo</a> to completely change up the design. While I liked how the site's design had evolved, I wanted it to look brighter and less cluttered. I took some of the feedback I had received over the past five years and gave Mel just a few rough ideas of what I was looking for.  In the end, though, I wanted the new design for Conservative Blogger to have a "Web 2.0" feel to it.  Mel delivered a design that was almost exactly as I saw it in my head and I couldn't be happier.</div><div><br /></div><div>The first obvious change is the "weathered flag" look that was the look of this site for more than half its existence on Al Gore's InterWebs is history.  It's been replaced by reds that are red, whites that are white and blues that are blue.  The new look is crisper, cleaner and much easier to read.</div><div><br /></div><div>Some of the other new changes to Conservative Blogger are...</div><div><br /></div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="twitterBadge.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/twitterBadge.jpg" width="197" height="204" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span><div><br /></div><div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; ">TWITTER</span></span>:</div><div><a href="http://www.twitter.com/conblog" style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: none;">Twitter</span></a> is a "micro-blogging" site where users can upload their comments in 140 characters or less. With Twitter, you can follow a group of people you wish to receive updates from and they, in turn, can follow you and see your posts as you update.</div><div><br /></div><div>This Twitter Badge in the sidebar enables people kind enough to stop by Conservative Blogger to see what I'm up to or what's on my mind--and it forces me to be brief! Twitter users can also see my blog postings in my Twitter updates as they're posted.</div><div><br /></div><div>Twitter has grown in popularity in 2008 and it's a tool I enjoy using.  Most recently, I used it to "live blog" the <a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/tonights_debate_live_blog_via.php">second presidential debate</a> between Obama and McCain.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="facebookBadge.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/facebookBadge.jpg" width="120" height="236" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; ">FACEBOOK</span></span>:</div><div><div><a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/William_Smith/505155282" style="text-decoration: underline; ">Facebook</a> is a social networking site that allows me to connect with my friends and family when I'm online.  It's where I'm likely to post photos, share a link to a website, communicate with friends or even play some "Star Trek" and "24" trivia games. </div><div><br /></div><div>It's also now a place where I've started to connect with people who read my blog.  I've been fortunate enough to add and get to know a few of the people who frequent the site and hope to get to know many more.</div><div><br /></div><div>If you're using Facebook, please feel welcome to send me a Friend Invite, and also be sure to mention Conservative Blogger in your request.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="cloud.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/cloud.jpg" width="235" height="196" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; ">TAG CLOUD</span></span>:</div><div>Also new to Conservative Blogger is what's called a "tag cloud."  The blog entries on this site are classified by "tags" or keywords of what the blog posting is about.  </div><div><br /></div><div>For example, an election-related article in 2008 might have tags like "Barack Obama," "John McCain," "Election," "2008," and other similar tags based on the content.</div><div><br /></div><div>You can click on any of the terms in the tag cloud at the top of this page (in the side bar) and you can see all postings with that tag.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">COMMENTS AND TRACKBACKS</span></span>:</div><div>When I started this blog, there was no method to leave comments on individual entries.  Because I was writing HTML pages myself, there was no database or no engine for comments.  With the upgrade to the new version of Conservative Blogger, you can now leave comments on individual entries at the bottom of every single blog posting.</div><div><br /></div><div>Additionally, if you have a blog and link to a blog posting on Conservative Blogger, you'll receive a reciprocal trackback link to your posting instantly. </div><div><br /></div><div>Of course, feedback can still be delivered the old-fashioned way using the <a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/feedback.php">Feedback</a> form on the website.  (At least, for now, until I get tired of the anonymous spam for erectile products I receive on a daily basis.)</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">COMING IN 2009</span></span>:</div><div>People often ask me what I plan on doing next with my blog. A year ago at this time, I had been working on getting a ConBlog Podcast off the ground.  Time was the biggest factor in that project plan.  As a one-man operation, it takes a significant time commitment to write, record, edit, mix and publish an audio podcast.  Thankfully, I've found an easier way to do the type of format I want to do:</div><div><br /></div><div><p align="center">
<a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/conblog">
<img id="btn180x60" border="0" alt="Listen to Conservative Blogger on internet talk radio" src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/img/180x60_wht.gif" width="180" height="60" /></a>
</p>
</div><div><br /></div><div>Thanks to <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com">BlogTalkRadio</a>, I'll be launching my own weekly internet radio program sometime in 2009.  It will be easier to produce than a podcast and will also allow me to take calls and comments from those listening.  The exact schedule is yet to be determined, but each episode would be archived for those who can't listen live.  If you have ideas or suggestions with regard to the format, please feel free to leave them as comments here on this posting or you can email them directly to talk.nospam@conservativeblogger.nospamcom.  (Leaving out the phrase "nospam" where appropriate."</div><div><br /></div><div>In closing, I'd like to thank everyone who has stopped by to read my blog over the last five years. Whether you agree or disagree, each of you who has taken the time to read or send feedback has helped make this a better blog.  I am fortunate enough to do what I do and there aren't words to appreciate the role each of you has played in the success of my little blog.</div><div><br /></div><div>From the bottom of my heart, and with all sincerity, I thank you.</div><div><br /></div><div>Here's to the next five years!</div><div><br /></div></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/my_5th_blogiversary.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/my_5th_blogiversary.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">BlogTalkRadio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Blogs and Blogging</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Conservatives</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Facebook</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Twitter</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">blogiversary</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">blogiversary</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogs and Blogging</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BlogTalkRadio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Conservative</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">election</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Politics</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Twitter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:17:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Tonight&apos;s &quot;Debate Live Blog&quot; via Twitter</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I'll be live on "Twitter" for tonight's Presidential Debate. 
<div><br /></div>
<div>Please visit <a href="http://www.twitter.com/conblog">http://www.twitter.com/conblog</a> or you can follow the 40 most recent updates below.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<hr>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 12px; "><ul id="twitter_update_list"><li><span>@manicLA: Obama was a zombie &amp; came across as robotic and uncaring. He could have showed an ounce of emotion and didn't. Uncaring. Unfeeling</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950747184" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Painful debate. No real winner, but McCain exhibited much more passion and had the stronger close. SLIGHT advantage: McCain. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950715346" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>McCain is coming across as more passionate. "I know what it's like." "I believe." Nice close. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950711678" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Not a strong finish for Obama. His closing needed to be passionate in this style of debate and it wasn't. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950707038" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>What is it with people from New Hampshire?? Oh, wait... #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950701725" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>North Korea quadrupled it's nuke capability because CLINTON GAVE THEM THE TECHNOLOGY!! AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!!! #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950699436" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: Yes, he does. Meeting with Iran with no preconditions is not good for him, though.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950696886" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@ericjodom: LOL. Nice.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950693930" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>I really don't get the sense that either guy *wins* this debate, or could for that matter. The format doesn't lend to it. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950690735" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 8 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: That's why I was playing Buzzword Bingo. :)</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950679445" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>"For the most part, I agree with Senator McCain." Doesn't Barack get that is the WRONG THING for him to say? LOL #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950677824" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>I'm still waiting for the pony tailed guy from the '92 debate to stand up and ask them to treat us like their children. LOL #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950676005" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@MediaLizzy: If he does, I'll bet he's never won.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950670227" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: See, I just don't see that at all. lol</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950663836" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>"If Pahkistahn is unable or unwilling to hunt down Bin Laden, I think we should." That sounds like invading to me. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950654602" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Sooo...Obama would send troops to places where there is not an interest to our National Security...yet he criticizes Iraq. Amazing #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950635642" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>There's McCain's painful moment: him trying to crack a joke. UGH. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950617256" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Hmmm...isn't Delaware JOE BIDEN'S state? Interesting, Barack. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950615010" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>There's the simplest difference: Republicans believe health care is a responsiblity; Democrats think it's a right. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950610179" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Just because government would be paying for it doesn't make the health care affordable. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950600359" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Brokaw's sarcasm is unwelcome. Just ask the questions, pal. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950588501" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Brokaw is being such a b!tch. LOL #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950583277" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Barack--no one is suggesting that drilling is the final solution. It's a necessary step to get us to the next level. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950582002" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Obama sounds like he'd rather be anywhere else other than that debate. Did we wake him or something? #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950576033" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>"What's the best way to fix that? Nuclear power!" And, he pronounced nuclear right! w00t! #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950572300" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Ah, yes, the inevitable climate change question. Who had 9:43pm EDT? #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950569199" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>I think the wheels are about to come off the structure of this debate and it's going to run right over Brokaw. LOL #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950565433" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: I think that's the last thing McCain should do. He *shouldn't* engage him directly...especially in this style of debate, I think</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950550176" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: they are, and better than they did last week. I just wish it were more spontaneous.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950542485" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Barack, $18 billion ISN'T a lot of money?!? C'mon... #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950539596" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>I thought Obama was going to finish "I believe..." with "the children are our future. Teach them well and let them lead the way." #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950534102" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Obama is invoking 9/11. That's the last place I thought he'd go. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950530485" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Brokaw keeps nagging about time. He's killing me. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950521806" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@GreenPuma: I hate these town hall debates. They're worthless.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950517804" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>Brokaw's "prioritize this list" question is painful. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950510297" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 9 hours ago</a></li><li><span>McCain seems far more passionate on this topic than Obama did. Barack seems too laid back. #debate08</span><a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950506981" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 10 hours ago</a></li><li><span>@MichiganTaxes: I'm sure BHO sent his own letter and that his name *isn't* on McCain's letter.</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950499820" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 10 hours ago</a></li><li><span>"How can we trust either of you with our money when both parties got us into this economic crisis?" Barack seems insincere. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950495672" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 10 hours ago</a></li><li><span>"Senator Obama's name is not on that letter." Ouch. #debate08</span> <a href="http://twitter.com/conblog/statuses/950491786" style="font-size: 85%; color: rgb(19, 49, 110); font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; ">about 10 hours ago</a></li></ul></span></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/tonights_debate_live_blog_via.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/tonights_debate_live_blog_via.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Debate</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:10:58 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>W2W4: Presidential Debate #2...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><br /></div>
<p>The second debate between Arizona Senator <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/">John McCain</a> and Illinois Senator <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/">Barack Obama</a> in their quest for the Presidency happens tonight in Nashville, TN on the campus of <a href="http://www.belmontdebate08.com/">Belmont University</a>.</p>
<p>Here is a little bit of What To Watch For (W2W4):</p>
<div>The format for this debate is the infamous "town hall style," which doesn't even remotely resemble a Town Hall meeting in the slightest fashion. &nbsp;All of the questions have been submitted in advance through the Internet and Tom Brokaw, interim host of "Meet The Press," will moderate this contest.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>The debate is hosted by the <a href="http://www.debates.org/">Commission on Presidential Debates</a>.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>An overview of the rules comes from the <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/mccain_obama_deal_puts_limits.html">Chicago Sun-Times</a>:</div>
<div><br /></div>
<blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 40px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic">Tuesday's match-up at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn., will be moderated by NBC's Tom Brokaw, with the questions to be culled from a group of 100 to 150 uncommitted likely voters in the audience and another one-third to come via the Internet. The Gallup Organization -- as in past debates like this -- has the job of making sure the questioners reflect the demographic makeup of the nation.</span><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic">Brokaw selects the questions to ask from written queries submitted prior to the debate, according to the "contract."</span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 40px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic">An audience member will not be allowed to switch questions. Under the deal, the moderator may not ask followups or make comments. The person who asks the question will not be allowed a follow-up either, and his or her microphone will be turned off after the question is read. A camera shot will only be shown of the person asking -- not reacting.</span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 40px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic">While there will be director's chairs (with backs and foot rests), McCain and Obama will be allowed to stand -- but they can't roam past their "designated area" to be marked on the stage. McCain and Obama are not supposed to ask each other direct questions.</span></blockquote>
<blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 40px; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="COLOR: rgb(0,0,0); FONT-STYLE: italic">As in all the debates, the contenders cannot bring in notes, though they can take them once at the lectern.</span></blockquote>
<div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>In the first debate, Obama started off somewhat strong, but McCain eventually owned the last sixty minutes once talk moved toward the topic of national security and defense. &nbsp;While both candidates dropped some whoppers, many people thought that McCain had a larger gap to overcome. &nbsp;A tie for him (which is what I think he achieved) was really a win in that sense.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Tonight the format is different and, as the <a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/amandascott/gGgPnS">Obama campaign has already pointed out</a>, it's a format that John McCain is exceedingly comfortable in.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Translation</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-STYLE: italic"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">:</span></span>&nbsp;They are already trying to set the bar low for Obama because he's not great at speaking&nbsp;extemporaneously. &nbsp;The lower they set the bar in advance of the debate, the bigger they can draw the win in the Spin Room.&nbsp;</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>With the way they've been spinning this tonight, the Obama camp <span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-STYLE: italic">can't </span>set the bar any lower. &nbsp;It's just not physically possible. &nbsp;Look for the "Obama Wins" email to go out before the debate is over.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Much like the last debate, McCain needs to ignore Obama and not make eye contact with him. &nbsp;This debate is all in the way the candidate looks in answering the audience member's question and he's well aware that's his focal point. &nbsp;It won't stop the Obama supporters from crying that McCain has disrespected Obama by not even looking at him, however.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>McCain needs to keep the snark to a minimum. &nbsp;Any time he laughs at his own joke is bad. Mac would be well-served by trying to skip the one-liners and just focus solely on Obama's record (or lack thereof).</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>John McCain won't want to talk about the economy, but he'll have to. &nbsp;He'll go right back to pork spending an earmarks and that's probably his best play here.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>Obama, however, has to be careful he doesn't step on a land mine tonight.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>In the last debate, he stammered and tried to cut in and he had been totally knocked off his game by John McCain. &nbsp;He'll try to avoid that tonight, but any forum where Barack is timed and he's got to respond off the cuff is a dangerous one. &nbsp;</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>As my <a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/obama_buzzword_bingo.php">Obama Buzzword Bingo cards</a> point out, he'll probably stick to a pretty tight script. &nbsp;He'll have to---any deviation from standard means he'll start stammering again, and this is the worst format for him to do that in.</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>The debate begins tonight at 9:00 PM EDT on just about every network there is and is also available in high definition.</div>
<div><br /></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/w2w4_presidential_debate_2.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/w2w4_presidential_debate_2.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">President</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Debate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">W2W4</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">W2W4</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:28:33 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Obama Buzzword Bingo...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Last week for the Vice Presidential Debate, I saw some "Palin Bingo" cards that were circulating  on Al Gore's Interwebs.  <div><br /></div><div>For tonight's second Presidential Debate between John McCain and Barack Obama, I've decided to create my own.  Below are three different Buzzword Bingo cards so you can play along.</div><div><br /></div><div>The winner takes home absolutely nothing--just as it would be in a Barack Oama administration.</div><div><br /></div><div><hr><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ObamaBingo1.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/ObamaBingo1.jpg" width="490" height="536" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></div></div><div><hr><br /></div><div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ObamaBingo2.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/ObamaBingo2.jpg" width="490" height="536" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></div><div style="text-align: left;"><hr><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="ObamaBingo_uhh.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/ObamaBingo_uhh.jpg" width="490" height="536" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/obama_buzzword_bingo.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/obama_buzzword_bingo.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Buzzword Bingo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Debate</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Buzzword Bingo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:06:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Cult of Audacity of Hope...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><br /></div>Back after his acceptance speech at Invesco Field at Mile High in Denver, Colorado, I recall my girlfriend remarking that the attendees of the DNC looked like "pods" and Obama, their cult leader.<div><br /></div><div>The videos below only serve to reinforce that belief in my mind.<br /><div><br /><div><div style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUEQz5dltmI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUEQz5dltmI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></object></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">(If you are unable to see the embedded "Obama Youth" video above, please click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUEQz5dltmI">here</a>.)</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">Or, perhaps, you'd like to view<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"> this </span>little piece of indoctrination:</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="349"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WtGrp5MbzAI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WtGrp5MbzAI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="349"></object></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;">(If you are unable to see the children's chorus singing for Obama in the embedded video above, please click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtGrp5MbzAI">here</a>.)</div><div style="text-align: center;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">Creepy</span></span>.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">These children in both videos are being indoctrinated into a religio-politico sect whether they realize it or not.  Some have compared these videos to Third Reich propaganda, but I don't think that's a fair comparison.  I think these videos speak directly to the Obamessiah Complex that a lot of liberal activists view their candidate with. </div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">Now, they're brainwashing their children.  Sick.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">I'm all for having and advocating a political ideology, but this truly has evolved into cult status.</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">Think I'm exaggerating?  OK.  That's fair.  For the sake of argument, let's look at some of the common characteristics of cults that can be found in <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=common+characteristics+of+cults&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=">a Google search</a> with bracketed comments by me:</div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;"><div style="text-align: left;"><ul><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Members swear total allegiance to an all-powerful leader who they believe to be the Messiah</span>. [Check.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Rational thought is discouraged or forbidden</span>. [Check.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">The cult's recruitment techniques are often deceptive</span>. [Check--at Obama rallies the first thing they want you to do is fill out a "supporter card" with personal info.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">The cult weakens the follower psychologically by making him or her depend upon the group to solve his or her problems</span>. [Check, "Obama's gonna change it; Obama's going to lead us."]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">The cults manipulate guilt to their advantage</span>. [Check, class warfare/taxation]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">The cult leader makes all the career and life decision of the members</span>. [Check, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/25/opinion/25kristol.html?pagewanted=print">Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed</a>."]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cults exist only for their own material survival and make false promises to work to improve society</span>. [Check, "95% of you will receive a tax cut."]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cult members often work fulltime for the group for little or no pay</span>. [Check, in part. Many have taken leaves of absence from their jobs to campaign full-time.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cult members are isolated from the outside world and any reality testing it could provide</span>. [Check, in part. Their reality is the campaign, polls and the press cycle.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cults are anti-woman, anti-child, and anti-family.</span> [Check, in part. While Michelle Obama has practically disappeared from the campaign trail, some would argue that the pro-choice stance of liberal activists meets the other two criteria.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cults are apocalyptic and believe themselves to be the remnant who will survive the soon-approaching end of the world</span>. [Check. See: global warming or other crisis du jour.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Many cults follow an "ends justify the means" philosophy</span>. [Check.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Cults, particularly in regard to their finances, are shrouded in secrecy</span>. [Check. While his campaign finances are tracked to meet legal requirements, Obama has commented on how there are <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8STLEOG0&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0">no financial records</a> of his time in Illinois.]</li><li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">There is frequently an aura of or potential for violence around cults</span>. [Check. I've been to an Obama rally in NH where I had to pretend I was a supporter.  There was a lot of spite, vitriol and violent talk by the attendees for Republicans and Conservatives.]</li></ul></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;">How many items on that list does the Obama campaign fit?  Too many.</div></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div><div style="text-align: left;"><br /></div></div></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_cult_of_audacity_of_hope.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_cult_of_audacity_of_hope.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cult</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:21:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Bailout: You Lose...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><br /></div>As you're probably aware, both the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26953481/">Senate</a> and the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27011002/">House</a> passed the Bailout Bill this past week and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26987291/">President Bush signed it into law</a>.<div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Congratulations</span>, America!</div><div><br /></div><div>With the advent of that minimum $800 billion legislation, you get to pay for the following--with a possible total "investment" of 1.8 <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">T-T-T-TRILLION</span> dollars:</div><div><br /></div><div><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="2008bailout.gif" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/2008bailout.gif" width="492" height="267" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">(Source: <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10057618-38.html?tag=nl.e433">CNET.com</a>)</span></span></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: -editor-proxy; font-style: italic;"><br /></span></div><div>And that's not all!  With the vote of our Senate and our House of Representatives, we now get the esteemed pleasure of <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/01/senate-bailout-bill-hits-the-internet/">paying for the following earmarks</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">(read: p</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">ork projects)</span></span>:</div><div><br /></div><div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.75em; margin-left: 20px; background-repeat: repeat-y; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; ">New Tax earmarks in Bailout bill</span></blockquote><div><div><ul style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.75em; margin-left: 20px; background-repeat: repeat-y; list-style-type: disc; list-style-position: outside; list-style-image: initial; "><ul style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.75em; margin-left: 20px; background-repeat: repeat-y; list-style-type: disc; list-style-position: outside; list-style-image: initial; "><li>Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)</li><li>Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)</li><li>6 page package of earmarks for litigants in the 1989 Exxon Valdez incident, Alaska (Sec. 504)</li></ul></ul></div></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="border-top-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-bottom-style: none; border-left-style: none; border-width: initial; border-color: initial; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.75em; margin-left: 20px; background-repeat: repeat-y; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; ">Tax earmark "extenders" in the bailout bill</span><br /><ul style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0.75em; margin-left: 20px; background-repeat: repeat-y; list-style-type: disc; list-style-position: outside; list-style-image: initial; "><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">American Samoa (Sec. 309)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Railroads (Sec. 316)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Auto Racing Tracks (317)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">District of Columbia  (Sec. 322)</li><li style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; font-size: 1em; font-weight: normal; ">Wool Research (Sec. 325)</li></ul></blockquote></div><div><br /></div><div>However, even more troublesome than all of that is the revelation that this legislation also contains an extension of power to the Internal Revenue Service that had previously expired on January 1, 2008.</div><div><br /></div><div>Yeah, we really didn't hear about that part from our Senators and Congressmen, did we?</div><div><br /></div><div>Again, from <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10057618-38.html?tag=nl.e433">CNET.com</a>:<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px; "></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; font-style: italic; line-height: 17px; ">The bailout bill also gives the Internal Revenue Service new authority to conduct undercover operations. It would immunize the IRS from a passel of federal laws, including permitting IRS agents to run businesses for an extended sting operation, to open their own personal bank accounts with U.S. tax dollars, and so on. (Think IRS agents posing as accountants or tax preparers and saying, "I'm not sure if that deduction is entirely legal, but it'll save you $1,000. Want to take it?") That section had expired as of January 1, 2008, and would now be renewed.</span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-size: 12px; font-style: italic; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Starting with the so-called Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1988, the IRS has possessed this authority temporarily, with occasional multiple-year lapses. A 1999 internal report said the IRS had 126 "trained undercover agents" working in field offices at the time. This is the first time that such undercover authority would be made permanent.</span></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-size: 12px; font-style: italic; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">...</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">There's another section of the bailout bill worth noting. It lets the IRS give information from individual tax returns to any federal law enforcement agency investigating suspected "terrorist" activity, which can, in turn, share it with local and state police. Intelligence agencies such as the CIA and the National Security Agency can also receive that information.</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"></span></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">The information that can be shared includes "a taxpayer's identity, the nature, source, or amount of his income, payments, receipts, deductions, exemptions, credits, assets, liabilities, net worth, tax liability, tax withheld, deficiencies, overassessments, or tax payments, whether the taxpayer's return was, is being, or will be examined or subject to other investigation or processing, or any other data received by, recorded by, prepared by, furnished to, or collected by the Secretary with respect to a return."</span></span></blockquote><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(53, 53, 53); font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px; "><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: normal; "></span></p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; ">So, not only has the Government of our United States of America purchased billions of dollars in bad debt, they've also purchased a little more of our collective freedom.  It took a lot more than thirty pieces of silver, too, and we paid them to do it.</p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; ">After all, we all know what a <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">munificent</span> organization the Internal Revenue Service can be.  They're such a forgiving and compassionate organization that <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">truly cares</span> about the American taxpayer.</p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; ">I wonder why our Senators (like Barack Obama or John McCain) didn't talk about <i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">that</span></i>.
<br />I wonder why our Congressmen failed to mention <i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">that</span></i>. 
<br />I wonder why the President didn't announce <i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">that</span></i> at the bill signing.</p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; ">What the hell have they gotten us into?</p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; ">Thanks a <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">lot</span>, Washington.  You stay classy.</p><p style="margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 100%; font-family: inherit; text-align: left; vertical-align: baseline; margin-top: 15px; line-height: 144.5%; "><br /></p></span></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_bailout_you_lose.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/10/the_bailout_you_lose.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Senate/House</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">bailout</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bush</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Economy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">House</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Senate</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:23:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Return of Jack Bauer!</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p></p>Today seems to be online media day here at Conservative Blogger!<div><br /></div><div>I was online earlier today when someone sent me this link.  It's the trailer for the 2 hour made-for-television movie of "<a href="http://www.fox.com/24/">24</a>," starring Kiefer Sutherland as CTU Agent Jack Bauer.</div><div><br /></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">Filmed on location in Cape Town, South Africa, and Los Angeles, 24: REDEMPTION stars Emmy Award winner Kiefer Sutherland along with new cast members Cherry Jones, Robert Carlyle, Gil Bellows and Academy Award winner Jon Voight.</span><br /><br /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">After sacrificing everything for his country, Jack Bauer (Sutherland) is wanted by the U.S. government and now stands to lose the only thing he has left: his freedom. Working as a missionary in Africa, Bauer is called upon to stop a ruthless warlord from drafting innocent children into his murderous militia. First, Bauer must confront his own torturous past and face an impossible decision that will change his life forever. A decision that will set the stage and raise the stakes for Season Seven, which debuts in January 2009.</span></blockquote><div><br /></div><div>"24: Redemption" premieres Sunday, November 23, at 8pm on FOX.</div><div><p align="center">
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://widgets.clearspring.com/o/471e8e590c325dbb/48e233e7b3964f3f/471e8e59a3f033/a7fbc07d/widget.js"></script></p></div><br /><br /><div><br /></div><div>(If you are unable to see the embedded trailer widget for "24: Redemption," please click <a href="http://www.fox.com/24/trailer/">here</a> to go to the official website.)</div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/the_return_of_jack_bauer.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/the_return_of_jack_bauer.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">24</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">24</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Jack Bauer</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kiefer Sutherland</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:27:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Electoral Predictions: Where I&apos;m At...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p></p>I spent some time this evening revising my electoral vote map. &nbsp;This is a work in progress that I'll lock in on the evening of November 3rd--the night before the general election.
<div><br /></div>
<div>As of right now, here's where I stand:</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<p align="center"><a href="http://conblog.predictnovember.com/"><img alt="PredictNovember.com" src="http://conblog.predictnovember.com/map_500.png" /></a></p></div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>For "battleground" or "swing" states right now, I'm liking the following:</div>
<div><br /></div>
<div>
<ul>
<ul>
<ul>
<li>Arkansas</li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">New Hampshire</span>&nbsp;(my state)</li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">New Mexico</span></li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">North Carolina</span></li>
<li><span class="Apple-style-span" style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">West Virginia</span></li></ul></ul></ul>
<div>That's&nbsp;five states for a total of&nbsp;35 electoral votes. &nbsp;With the election being only five weeks from today, there may be states added or dropped from this list. &nbsp;The ones in bold are the ones that I think will remain too close to call prior to election day. &nbsp;(Again, I caveat that with "right now, at this moment.")</div>
<div><br /></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/electoral_predictions_where_im.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/electoral_predictions_where_im.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Electoral College</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">President</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Election 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electoral college</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">McCain 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Obama 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Predict November</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">vote</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:15:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>&quot;An American Carol&quot; Podcast and Movie Trailer...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p></p>This past Saturday, I once again had the pleasure of being a guest panelist on Niel Young's "The Advocates" on WEZS 1350AM in Laconia, New Hampshire.  One of Niel's scheduled guests was <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2935128/">Myrna Sokoloff</a>, one of the writers and executive producers of the new <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001878/">David Zucker</a> film, "<a href="http://www.americancarol.com">An American Carol</a>."<blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><br /></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">The American spirit is celebrated in the outrageous and totally irreverent comedy An American Carol from David Zucker, the master of questionable taste (Airplane!, The Naked Gun, Scary Movie 3 and 4).</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><br /><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; line-height: 17px; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">In An American Carol a cynical, Anti-American Hollywood filmmaker sets out on a crusade to abolish the 4th of July holiday. He is visited by three spirits who take him on a hilarious journey in an attempt to show him the true meaning of America.</span></span></blockquote><div><div><br /></div><div>This movie is a comedy opening in wide-release on more than 2,000 screens this coming Friday, October 3rd. It is a film written by, produced by and starring Hollywood <span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">conservatives</span>. It stars names like Kelsey Grammar, Kevin Farley, Jon Voight and Dennis Hopper, among others. <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; "></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><br /></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">Finally</span>, a movie that articulates our view instead of the normal Leftist tripe that Hollywood churns out year after year!</div><div><br /></div><div>Myrna was only going to join us for a few minutes but wound up talking with us for just over <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic; ">half an hour</span>!  Hear her interview with host Niel Young, guest panelist Judy Krahulec and me as she talks about writing and filming the comedy, as well as some anecdotes from the film's production.  Listen below by clicking the play button:</div><div><br /></div><div>		<div>
	<p align="center">
	<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0" width="210" height="35" id="mp3playerdarksmallv3" align="middle">
	<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="sameDomain" />
	<param name="movie" value="http://www.podbean.com/podcast-audio-video-blog-player/mp3playerdarksmallv3.swf?audioPath=http://www.conservativeblogger.com/AmericanCarol.mp3&amp;autoStart=no" />
	<param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
	  <embed src="http://www.podbean.com/podcast-audio-video-blog-player/mp3playerdarksmallv3.swf?audioPath=http://www.conservativeblogger.com/AmericanCarol.mp3&amp;autoStart=no" quality="high" width="210" height="35" name="mp3playerdarksmallv3" align="middle" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></object>
	<br /><a style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; font-weight: normal; padding-left: 41px; color: #2DA274; text-decoration: none; border-bottom: none;" href="http://www.podbean.com">Powered by Podbean.com</a>
	</p></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">(If you are unable to use the Flash player embedded above, you can download the .mp3 of the podcast </span></span><a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/AmericanCarol.mp3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">here</span></span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: '-editor-proxy';">.)</span></span></div><div><br /></div><div>Here, too, is the film's official trailer in Quicktime format:</div><div><br /></div><div><p align="center"><object classid="clsid:02BF25D5-8C17-4B23-BC80-D3488ABDDC6B" codebase="http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab" height="285" width="480"> 
<param name="src" value="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/AnAmericanCarolTrailer.mov" />
<param name="autoplay" value="true" />
<param name="type" value="video/quicktime" />
<embed src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/AnAmericanCarolTrailer.mov" autoplay="true" type="video/quicktime" pluginspage="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/download/"></object></p>

</div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">(If you do not have Apple's Quicktime on your system, you can download it for free </span><a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">here</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">. If you cannot see the video embedded above, please visit the official </span><a href="http://www.americancarol.com"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">An American Carol</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"> website.)</span></div><div><br /></div><div>This looks like a very funny film and I'm looking forward to seeing it this coming weekend.  I hope you are, too.</div><div><br /></div><div>"Laugh like your country depends on it," indeed!</div></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/an_american_carol_podcast_and.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/an_american_carol_podcast_and.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">An American Carol</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Niel Young</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Podcasts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">WEZS</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">An American Carol</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">movies</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Niel Young</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">podcast</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WEZS</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:27:10 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Radio Appearance, Saturday 9/27...</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p></p>Tomorrow morning, Saturday, September 27th, I'll be making a return appearance on "The Advocates."  Be sure to tune in to WEZS 1350AM (if you're in New Hampshire) or catch the online stream at WEZS.com!<div><br /></div><div style="text-align: center;"><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="advocatesAd.jpg" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/advocatesAd.jpg" width="298" height="369" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/radio_appearance_saturday_927.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/09/radio_appearance_saturday_927.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Niel Young</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Debate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Talk Radio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">WEZS</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Debates</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Elections</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">New Hampshire</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Niel Young</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">talk radio</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">WEZS</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:14:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
