<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Conservative Blogger</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Conservative Blogger" />
    <updated>2008-07-04T19:00:16Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Conservative Analysis and Opinion from Ordinary Individuals and Everyday People.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>In Congress, July 4, 1776</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/07/in_congress_july_4_1776.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=602" title="In Congress, July 4, 1776" />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.602</id>
    
    <published>2008-07-04T18:51:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-04T19:00:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Independence Day" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/declaration.jpg" width="400" height="491" />
</p>

<p><strong>The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription</strong></p>

<hr>

<p>IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.</p>

<p><strong>The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,</strong></p>

<p>When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.</p>

<p>We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.</p>

<p>He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.<br />
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.<br />
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. <br />
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. <br />
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.<br />
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.<br />
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.<br />
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.<br />
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.<br />
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.<br />
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.<br />
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.<br />
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:<br />
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:<br />
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:<br />
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:<br />
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: <br />
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:<br />
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences<br />
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:<br />
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:<br />
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.<br />
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.<br />
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. <br />
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.<br />
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. <br />
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.</p>

<p>In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.</p>

<p>Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.</p>

<p>We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.</p>

<hr>

<p><em>The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated</em>:</p>

<p><strong>Column 1<br />
Georgia:</strong><br />
   Button Gwinnett<br />
   Lyman Hall<br />
   George Walton</p>

<p><strong>Column 2<br />
North Carolina:</strong><br />
   William Hooper<br />
   Joseph Hewes<br />
   John Penn<br />
<strong>South Carolina:</strong><br />
   Edward Rutledge<br />
   Thomas Heyward, Jr.<br />
   Thomas Lynch, Jr.<br />
   Arthur Middleton</p>

<p><strong>Column 3<br />
Massachusetts:</strong><br />
John Hancock<br />
Maryland:<br />
Samuel Chase<br />
William Paca<br />
Thomas Stone<br />
Charles Carroll of Carrollton<br />
<strong>Virginia:</strong><br />
George Wythe<br />
Richard Henry Lee<br />
Thomas Jefferson<br />
Benjamin Harrison<br />
Thomas Nelson, Jr.<br />
Francis Lightfoot Lee<br />
Carter Braxton</p>

<p><strong>Column 4<br />
Pennsylvania:</strong><br />
   Robert Morris<br />
   Benjamin Rush<br />
   Benjamin Franklin<br />
   John Morton<br />
   George Clymer<br />
   James Smith<br />
   George Taylor<br />
   James Wilson<br />
   George Ross<br />
<strong>Delaware:</strong><br />
   Caesar Rodney<br />
   George Read<br />
   Thomas McKean</p>

<p><strong>Column 5</strong><br />
<strong>New York:</strong><br />
   William Floyd<br />
   Philip Livingston<br />
   Francis Lewis<br />
   Lewis Morris<br />
<strong>New Jersey:</strong><br />
   Richard Stockton<br />
   John Witherspoon<br />
   Francis Hopkinson<br />
   John Hart<br />
   Abraham Clark</p>

<p><strong>Column 6<br />
New Hampshire:</strong><br />
   Josiah Bartlett<br />
   William Whipple<br />
<strong>Massachusetts:</strong><br />
   Samuel Adams<br />
   John Adams<br />
   Robert Treat Paine<br />
   Elbridge Gerry<br />
<strong>Rhode Island:</strong><br />
   Stephen Hopkins<br />
   William Ellery<br />
<strong>Connecticut:</strong><br />
   Roger Sherman<br />
   Samuel Huntington<br />
   William Williams<br />
   Oliver Wolcott<br />
<strong>New Hampshire:</strong><br />
   Matthew Thornton <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>John Stephen for NH 1st CD...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/john_stephen_for_nh_1st_cd.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=601" title="John Stephen for NH 1st CD..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.601</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T19:36:42Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T19:39:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>It is with great pride and enthusiasm that I officially endorse John Stephen in the upcoming Republican Primary for New Hampshire&apos;s 1st Congressional District. I&apos;ve been fortunate enough to meet and speak with John on a couple of occasions and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Carol Shea-Porter" />
            <category term="Democrats" />
            <category term="Elections" />
            <category term="Jeb Bradley" />
            <category term="John Stephen" />
            <category term="NH 1st Congressional District" />
            <category term="Republicans" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/jstephen.jpg" align="right" width="160" height="197">It is with great pride and enthusiasm that I officially endorse John Stephen in the upcoming Republican Primary for New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District.</p>

<p>I've been fortunate enough to meet and speak with John on a couple of occasions and I've sincerely been impressed by him. John has served as a prosecutor, both for Hillsborough County and as an Assistant Attorney General. He was also the Granite State's first Coordinator of Homeland Security. Most recently, he was Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services.</p>

<p>Beyond all of that, I believe John Stephen "gets it." He understands that Washington is broken and he truly wants to fix it.  He is a <em>true</em> Conservative--and that's precisely what we need.</p>

<p>Please...take the time to find out more about John Stephen by going to his website, <a href="http://www.johnstephen.com">JohnStephen.com</a>, or by attending one of the many Meet and Greet sessions taking place all over New Hampshire throughout the summer.</p>

<p>John Stephen is the right man for the job at a time when we <em>truly</em> need someone to stand up and represent us now more than ever.  I urge you to consider casting your vote for him on September 9, 2008.</p>

<p align="center">
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/403YE7qPwe8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>
  <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/403YE7qPwe8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
</p>

<p>(If you are unable to see John Stephen's first television advertisement embedded above, please click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=403YE7qPwe8">here</a>.)</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;We Are All Hussein?...&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/we_are_all_hussein.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=600" title="&quot;We Are All Hussein?...&quot;" />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.600</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-30T17:25:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T17:27:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary> One of my favorite bloggers, Debbie Schlussel, writes this morning about one of the most asinine things I&apos;ve ever heard: From the New York Times: Emily Nordling has never met a Muslim, at least not to her knowledge. But...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Barack Obama" />
            <category term="Democrats" />
            <category term="Elections" />
            <category term="Liberals" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/idiOt_sm.jpg" /></p>

<p>One of my favorite bloggers, <a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/06/frickin_dumbest.html">Debbie Schlussel</a>, writes this morning about one of the most asinine things I've ever heard:</p>

<p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html?ei=5070&en=f0bd43216c4216e1&ex=1215489600&adxnnl=1&emc=eta1&adxnnlx=1214840945-C89HDjVrUT9bI0lJ2pKuNQ">New York Times</a>:</p>

<p><em><blockquote>Emily Nordling has never met a Muslim, at least not to her knowledge. But this spring, Ms. Nordling, a 19-year-old student from Fort Thomas, Ky., gave herself a new middle name on Facebook.com, mimicking her boyfriend and shocking her father.</blockquote></p>

<blockquote>"Emily Hussein Nordling," her entry now reads.</blockquote>

<blockquote>With her decision, she joined a growing band of supporters of Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, who are expressing solidarity with him by informally adopting his middle name. </blockquote></em>

<blockquote>...</blockquote>

<p><em><blockquote>"I am sick of Republicans pronouncing Barack Obama's name like it was some sort of cuss word," Mr. [Jeff] Strabone wrote in a manifesto titled "We Are All Hussein" that he posted on his own blog and on dailykos.com. </blockquote></em></p>

<p>We're all Hussein?!?  I don't think that's what Mom and Dad had in mind when they gave me "Edward" as a middle name.  </p>

<p>Debbie Schlussel says she can feel America's I.Q. dropping rapidly and I couldn't agree more.  What scares me further is that these may be the kids that are dispensing my meds someday.  Eek.</p>

<p>The thing that's slightly humorous to me in all this is that the Obama Campaign has been trying to get away from "Hussein" since Barack threw his hat in the ring.  It's an albatross to them and, as long as people are bringing it up, it further propagates the <em>incorrect</em> notion that Senator Obama is Muslim.  Now, there are people adopting the middle name as a sign of solidarity.  You can bet the strategists are shaking their heads.</p>

<p>This doesn't seem to be a fad that will "swiffer" the nation, but it is absolutely the dumbest movement I've seen in a long time.  The presumptive nominee seems to like the idea, too, if the New York Times article is any indication:</p>

<p><em><blockquote>Mr. Obama may be more enthusiastic, judging from his response at a Chicago fund-raiser two weeks ago. When he saw that Richard Fizdale, a longtime contributor, wore "Hussein" on his name tag, Mr. Obama broke into a huge grin, Mr. Fizdale said.</blockquote> </p>

<blockquote>"The theory was, we’re all Hussein," Mr. Obama said to the crowd later, explaining Mr. Fizdale's gesture.</blockquote></em>

<p>Hmmm...mass singular identification...manifesto...charismatic leader... Those are usually the indicators of <em><u>cults</u></em>, last I knew.  That, or the <a href="http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/aliens/article/70558.html">Borg</a> from Star Trek.  I'm not really sure which.</p>

<p>"We are all Hussein??"  No.  "We are all <em>IDIOTS</em>," is more like it.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>What Do Conservatives Believe?...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/what_do_conservatives_believe.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=599" title="What Do Conservatives Believe?..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.599</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-27T18:39:31Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-27T18:41:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary>As a conservative and a blogger, I&apos;d have to say that one of the most frustrating thing about reading other [read: liberal] blogs is that they think they know what my conservatism means. They attribute all kinds of racist/bigoted/homophobic stereotypes...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Conservatives" />
            <category term="Glenn Beck" />
            <category term="Talk Radio" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a conservative and a blogger, I'd have to say that one of the most frustrating thing about reading other [read: liberal] blogs is that they <em>think</em> they know what my conservatism means.  They attribute all kinds of racist/bigoted/homophobic stereotypes and present that as their definition--and it's one that's widely parroted by liberal members of the media.</p>

<p>In a commentary today on CNN.com, conservative talk show host <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com">Glenn Beck</a> discusses the differences between being a conservative and being a Republican.  He also defines what he thinks conservatives must believe. Here are some excerpts:</p>

<p><em><blockquote>A conservative believes that our inalienable rights do not include housing, healthcare or Hummers.</blockquote></p>

<blockquote>A conservative believes that our inalienable rights DO include the pursuit of happiness. That means it is guaranteed to no one.</blockquote>

<blockquote>A conservative believes that those who pursue happiness and find it have a right to not be penalized for that success.</blockquote>

<blockquote>A conservative believes that there are no protections against the hardship and heartache of failure. We believe that the right to fail is just as important as the chance to succeed and that those who do fail learn essential lessons that will help them the next time around.</blockquote>

<blockquote>A conservative believes in personal responsibility and accepts the consequences for his or her words and actions.</blockquote>

<blockquote>A conservative believes that real compassion can't be found in any government program.</blockquote></em>

<p>To read the rest of Glenn Beck's commentary, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/25/beck.conservatives/index.html">click on over to his essay on CNN.com</a>.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>&quot;...Shall Not Be Infringed.&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/shall_not_be_infringed.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=598" title="&quot;...Shall Not Be Infringed.&quot;" />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.598</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-27T14:13:24Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-27T14:17:07Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In a 5-4 ruling yesterday, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling that a firearms ban in the District of Columbia was unconstitutional. From what I&apos;ve heard, it was the first real challenge of the 2nd Amendment to the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="2nd Amendment" />
            <category term="Gun Control" />
            <category term="Heller" />
            <category term="Supreme Court" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a 5-4 ruling yesterday, the Supreme Court <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf">upheld the lower court ruling</a> that a firearms ban in the District of Columbia was unconstitutional.  From what I've heard, it was the first real challenge of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution in over 200 years.</p>

<p>In essence, the Court decided that the right to bear arms cannot be taken away by states or municipalities.  They also sent the message that the 2nd Amendment shouldn't be and isn't going anywhere.</p>

<p>Now, aside from all of the pro-gun/anti-gun debate that has been droning on for the last day, the really interesting fact in this ruling is this:</p>

<p><strong>Four of the Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States of America--whose sole job it is to determine the <em>constitutionality of law </em>in this country--think that something that's actually <strong>in the Constitution</strong> is <em><u>un</u>-constitutional</em>.</strong></p>

<p><em>Think </em>about that for a moment and let that sink in.  </p>

<p>Regardless of whether you favor guns or not, four people would like to take out their red pens and just strike the 2nd Amendment from the parchment on which its written because they think it shouldn't be there.</p>

<p>OK, so, I can hear some of you now: "But what if they already knew the other side had five votes and they were making a protest vote?"</p>

<p>Honestly, that's even <em>more</em> alarming to me.  Going back to their primary function in our form of government--deciding the constitutionality of our laws--the Supreme Court is <em>not</em> the place for protest votes.  Period.  Something is either constitutional or it isn't--that's a <em>binary </em>condition.  Four Justices don't think that's good enough, though.  They think that the 2nd Amendment needs "scope."</p>

<p>So, they don't like the 2nd Amendment.  Which one is next?  3?  5?  The <em>First</em>??  Which parts of the Bill of Rights need "scope," Justices??</p>

<p>Imagine what would have happened if they had just one more vote. Imagine what would have happened if John Kerry or Al Gore had won the Presidency. Where would the 2nd Amendment be today?</p>

<p>It would be a footnote in history.</p>

<p>Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg and Breyer have just demonstrated to all of us their complete and utter lack of qualifications for the positions they currently hold.</p>

<p>I never thought I'd ever say this, but...well...<em>thank you George W. Bush</em>.  At least <em>his </em>appointments to the Court understand that something in our Constitution--the essential document and statement on our Republic--cannot be found un-constitutional.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty Is &apos;Totally Badass&apos;...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/supreme_court_rules_death_pena.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=597" title="Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty Is 'Totally Badass'..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.597</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-24T22:47:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-24T22:47:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>One of the funniest sources for satire in this country has long been The Onion. I saw this video on MySpace today and I had a good laugh at this. I hope you do, too... ***LANGUAGE WARNING*** (If you are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Satire" />
            <category term="Supreme Court" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the funniest sources for satire in this country has long been The Onion.  I saw this video on MySpace today and I had a good laugh at this.  I hope you do, too...</p>

<p><b><font face="Arial Unicode MS" size="2" color="#FF0000">***LANGUAGE WARNING***</font></b></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="355" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/81809/video&autostart=false&image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/DEATH_PENALTY_article.jpg&bufferlength=3&embedded=true&title=Supreme%20Court%20Rules%20Death%20Penalty%20Is%20%27Totally%20Badass%27"></embed><br/>

<p>(If you are unable to see the embedded video above, please click here to go to <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/supreme_court_rules_death_penalty">The Onion's website</a>.  Be forewarned, however: some of the language used in the video is not suitable for children.)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>RIP, Tim Russert...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/rip_tim_russert.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=596" title="RIP, Tim Russert..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.596</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-13T21:49:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-13T21:49:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Sad news at this hour: Tim Russert, the longest-serving host of television&apos;s longest-running program--NBC&apos;s &quot;Meet The Press&quot;--died today in Washington after suffering a heart attack. He was 58 years old. He was, not uncharacteristically, at work at the Washington Bureau...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Tim Russert" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sad news at this hour: Tim Russert, the longest-serving host of television's longest-running program--NBC's "Meet The Press"--died today in Washington after suffering a heart attack.  He was 58 years old.</p>

<p>He was, not uncharacteristically, at work at the Washington Bureau of NBC News.</p>

<p>To say that I'm stunned is an understatment. There was no one better at what he did than Tim Russert.  He was, by far, the best political newsman and interviewer in my lifetime.</p>

<p>I spent many a Sunday morning drinking my coffee in front of the television so I could see "Meet The Press."  Russert <em>always</em> made it must-see television.  He was a force...both in journalism and in American politics.  He and "Meet The Press" were the Gold Standard, without question.</p>

<p>I am stunned.  I am shocked.  I am saddened.</p>

<p>My deepest sympathies go to his wife, his son, and certainly his friends and colleagues.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>I&apos;m Feeling a Little Gassy...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/im_feeling_a_little_gassy.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=595" title="I'm Feeling a Little Gassy..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.595</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-12T02:37:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-12T02:38:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The topic of the day in other parts of Al Gore&apos;s Interwebs seems to be the blame game as it relates to the prices you and I are paying at the pump for gasoline. I don&apos;t have to tell you...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="American Dollar" />
            <category term="Economy" />
            <category term="Oil Prices" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The topic of the day in other parts of Al Gore's Interwebs seems to be the blame game as it relates to the prices you and I are paying at the pump for gasoline.  </p>

<p>I don't have to tell you we're paying through the nose.  We are.  It cost me $60.00 to fill up my 2001 Nissan Xterra today.  With the heat wave we just had here in the northeast, I got a whopping 18 miles per gallon for my hard-earned gasoline purchase.  I'm as frustrated as you are, believe me.</p>

<p>You figure that, a year ago, we were paying about a dollar less as a national average.  No, really...I looked it up at GasBuddy.com.  I even made a spiffy little chart:</p>

<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/priceChart.jpg" width="480" height="223" />
</p>

<p>On June 10, 2007, the national average for a gallon of unleaded gasoline was a little over $3.00 per gallon.  In that time, the price of crude oil has more than doubled from $65.00 per barrel to today's close at $138.63.  </p>

<p>Why is this important, you might ask?  In a campaign season where we hear about the "obscene and record profits" that the oil companies are getting, these behemoths seem to get the lion share of the blame.  </p>

<p>If it's not the oil companies, it's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hale-stewart/my-conversation-with-the_b_105134.html">President Bush</a>.  You know, he and his oil executive cronies who are making millions of dollars, hand over fist, due to the Iraq War.  Their greed and lies have caused us all to pay more at the pump---that is, if you believe half of what you hear.</p>

<p>Or, maybe it's the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10940.html">weak American Dollar</a>.  I mean, it was made that way as a result of the policies of George W. Bush, so it made the price of gas skyrocket since we can't buy as much from the Saudis with the value of our dollar.  We have to spend more to get the same amount.</p>

<p>If it's not the Bushies, the weak dollar because of Bush policies or the oil companies, it must be the Republicans in general.  Why, just today on a blog of the <a href="http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/12330">Kansas City Star</a>, the GOP was being thrown under the bus for the skyrocketing price of gas:</p>

<blockquote>With oil companies receiving more than $4 for each gallon of gas they sell, Senate Democrats today tried to eliminate the $17 billion in tax breaks Congress has awarded them in recent years.</blockquote>

<blockquote>It also imposed a windfall profits tax.</blockquote>

<blockquote>But Republicans wanted nothing to do with either. In a largely party line vote, they blocked the Democrats' attempt to bring the tax issue to a vote, so it died on the Senate floor.</blockquote>

<p>Wow...they covered all three bases right there, practically.  They got the oil companies by making it sound like all $4 in the price of a gallon of gas went straight to profit.  They got the Republicans and they talked about imposing a windfall profits tax--which, in laymen's terms, means "you made more money than you should have as an evil capitalist so we're going to tax you even <em>more</em> to penalize you and restrict the growth of your business."</p>

<p>I'm no economist, but I'm pretty sure that's all kinds of bad.</p>

<p>So, <em>who is</em> to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/PainAtThePump/story?id=5040887&page=1">blame</a>?</p>

<p>Well, I'm pretty sure that it's not George W. Bush, either.  Yes, the dollar is weaker and, while that might have something to do with his foreign policy I'm willing to bet it's not got as much to do with the price of gas as people might want us to believe.</p>

<p>I'm also pretty sure that it's not the oil companies or their "record profits."  They don't pull the crude oil out of the ground.  They just buy it by the barrel and turn it into the petroleum products we use in our every day lives.  Let's take a look at the breakdown of the cost of a dollar of gasoline...</p>

<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/gasdollars.jpg" width="471" height="342" />
</p>

<p>Seventy cents of each and every dollar of gasoline goes toward the price of the crude oil from which it was refined.  That's <em>seventy percent</em>.  That's not profit to the oil company; that's pure cost. </p>

<p>Thirteen cents of each and every dollar of gasoline goes toward taxes that we pay.  And, like actual mileage, that number may vary depending on the state in which you live.  The Government is taking almost 50 cents <em>per gallon</em> (at today's prices) and they do nothing to turn crude oil into gasoline, nothing to transport it to the gas pumps and they certainly don't put it in your car for you.</p>

<p>The remaining seventeen cents is refining and retailing and, presumably, this is where the oil companies come in to play.  After all is said and done, they make roughly 7.5% (or $0.075) on every dollar of gasoline sold.  Less than <u>eight cents</u>.  Those are the "outrageous profits" that the Liberals want me to get upset about. </p>

<p>Don't believe me?  OK.  That's fair.  In the interest of multiple sources and all, here's a picture from a hearing chaired by Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy just a couple of weeks ago:</p>

<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/leahy_gasdollars.jpg" width="399" height="292" /></p>

<p>His math is a little different, but it's essentially the same ratios.  He projects the oil company profit at 8.3 cents per dollar which isn't much of an improvement over the 7.5 that I quoted.</p>

<p>Oh, and Senator Leahy is Vermont's Senior Senator and has been in office since 1975.  He's also a Democrat.</p>

<p>Our gasoline price woes are an age old story and they're as simple as "supply and demand."</p>

<p>We are addicted to a substance that we do not produce in great enough quantity.  We are forced to buy much of the crude oil we refine from other countries, we pay the price the market dictates...and, right now, the market dictates quite a bit.</p>

<p>So, the only way to cause the price to come down is to increase the worldwide supply.  More supply = lower cost of crude = lower gas prices.</p>

<p>We must begin drilling for our own oil again in the United States.  Whether it means drilling within 50 miles of the US coast line or drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we must drill for oil.  Opponents say that the amount of oil we'd be drilling for wouldn't solve our problems long term.  Well, they could be right, but they could just as easily be wrong.  No one knows for sure how much oil there is...<u><strong>no one</strong></u>.</p>

<p>The price of crude oil is driven largely by speculation.  If it were announced tomorrow that the United States had lifted its drilling prohibitions and would once again resume domestic oil exploration and production, what do you think would likely happen to the speculation on the oil market?</p>

<p>The likely result is it would drive the price down and <em>not</em> up.</p>

<p>The price of oil isn't coming down any other way.</p>

<p>What about renewable energy sources, you might ask?  Shouldn't we be investing in the future to lessen our dependency on fossil fuels in general?  My answer is: <strong>absolutely!</strong>   The only problem is that doesn't do us any good in the here and now when working families are having to spend twice as much as they on gas as they did 18 months ago.  The dollar is weaker, wage increases are down, inflation is on the rise...we need to lower the burden on people now and putting all of our eggs in the basket of new and renewable technologies doesn't help us relieve that pain point.</p>

<p>We are paying through the nose and we have the ability and the knowledge required to ease some of our own pain, but lawmakers don't want to.  Is this a bit of an oversimplification?  Perhaps...but even in its simplest form, the conclusion is still the same: the majority of cost in a gallon of gas is the crude oil purchased to produce it.  To lower the cost of gas, you must first lower the cost of the crude.  It really is that simple.</p>

<p>Who is to blame?  Congress is to blame, in my opinion.  They won't untie our hands to bring these prices down.  Don't get mad at the oil companies or the President or anyone else other than the people who represent you in Congress.</p>

<p>It's time to drill for oil <em>here</em> and the time to do it is <em>now</em>.</p>

<p>Send a message. Call your Senator and Congressman. Sign this online petition: <a href="http://www.americansolutions.com/actioncenter/petitions/?Guid=54ec6e43-75a8-445b-aa7b-346a1e096659">DRILL HERE. DRILL NOW. PAY LESS.</a>  We did it with the McCain-Kennedy Immigration Bill and we can do it with this.</p>

<p>It's time for Congress to understand that we're tired of paying for their shortsightedness.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>D-Day, 64 Years Later...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/dday_64_years_later.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=594" title="D-Day, 64 Years Later..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.594</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-06T20:49:23Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-06T20:49:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Anyone with a sense of history knows what today is. Sixty-four years ago today, Allied forces landed at Normandy in what was one of the largest invasions ever staged at the time. Approximately 150,000 men landed on June 6,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="World War II" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/invasion_begins.jpg" width="303" height="400" />
</p>

<p>Anyone with a sense of history knows what today is.</p>

<p>Sixty-four years ago today, Allied forces landed at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Normandy">Normandy</a> in what was one of the largest invasions ever staged at the time.  Approximately 150,000 men landed on June 6, 1944 to drive the Nazis back and break the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Wall">Atlantic Wall</a>.</p>

<p>Perhaps one of the most moving speeches I ever heard to commemorate the day was delivered by Ronald Reagan.  His now famous "Boys of Pointe do Hoc" speech was delivered 24 years ago today and I reprint it here for your consideration on this anniversary.</p>

<p>Truly, the World War II generation <em>saved</em> this planet.  We owe them <u>so</u> much and it's a debt we will never be able to repay.</p>

<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/d_day.jpg" width="390" height="315" />
</p>

<hr>
<strong>Remarks at the U.S. Ranger Monument</strong> 
<strong>President Ronald Reagan</strong>
<strong>Pointe du Hoc, France </strong>
<strong>June 6, 1984</strong>

<p><em>One of two speeches commemorating the 40th Anniversary of the D-Day Invasion, this speech was delivered at the site of the U.S. Ranger Monument at Pointe du Hoc, France, where veterans of the Normandy Invasion, and others, had assembled for the ceremony. Later during the day, President Reagan spoke at Omaha Beach, France.</em></p>

<p><br />
We're here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For four long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved, and the world prayed for its rescue. Here in Normandy the rescue began. Here the Allies stood and fought against tyranny in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history. </p>

<p>We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but 40 years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, 225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs. Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance. </p>

<p>The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers--the edge of the cliffs shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe. Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After two days of fighting, only 90 could still bear arms. </p>

<p>Behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there. </p>

<p>These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war. </p>

<p>Gentlemen, I look at you and I think of the words of Stephen Spender's poem. You are men who in your "lives fought for life...and left the vivid air signed with your honor.''</p>

<p>I think I know what you may be thinking right now--thinking, "We were just part of a bigger effort; everyone was brave that day.'' Well, everyone was. Do you remember the story of Bill Millin of the 51st Highlanders? Forty years ago today, British troops were pinned down near a bridge, waiting desperately for help. Suddenly, they heard the sound of bagpipes, and some thought they were dreaming. Well, they weren't. They looked up and saw Bill Millin with his bagpipes, leading the reinforcements and ignoring the smack of the bullets into the ground around him.</p>

<p>Lord Lovat was with him--Lord Lovat of Scotland, who calmly announced when he got to the bridge, "Sorry I'm a few minutes late,'' as if he'd been delayed by a traffic jam, when in truth he'd just come from the bloody fighting on Sword Beach, which he and his men had just taken. </p>

<p>There was the impossible valor of the Poles who threw themselves between the enemy and the rest of Europe as the invasion took hold, and the unsurpassed courage of the Canadians who had already seen the horrors of war on this coast. They knew what awaited them there, but they would not be deterred. And once they hit Juno Beach, they never looked back.</p>

<p>All of these men were part of a rollcall of honor with names that spoke of a pride as bright as the colors they bore: the Royal Winnipeg Rifles, Poland's 24th Lancers, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, the Screaming Eagles, the Yeomen of England's armored divisions, the forces of Free France, the Coast Guard's "Matchbox Fleet'' and you, the American Rangers. </p>

<p>Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet, you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief; it was loyalty and love. </p>

<p>The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge--and pray God we have not lost it--that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt. </p>

<p>You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One's country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew the people of your countries were behind you. </p>

<p>The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They thought--or felt in their hearts, though they couldn't know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m., in Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell. </p>

<p>Something else helped the men of D-Day: their rock-hard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer he told them: Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we're about to do. Also that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkness for the promise God made to Joshua: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.'' </p>

<p>These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies. </p>

<p>When the war was over, there were lives to be rebuilt and governments to be returned to the people. There were nations to be reborn. Above all, there was a new peace to be assured. These were huge and daunting tasks. But the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They rebuilt a new Europe together.</p>

<p>There was first a great reconciliation among those who had been enemies, all of whom had suffered so greatly. The United States did its part, creating the Marshall Plan to help rebuild our allies and our former enemies. The Marshall Plan led to the Atlantic alliance--a great alliance that serves to this day as our shield for freedom, for prosperity, and for peace. </p>

<p>In spite of our great efforts and successes, not all that followed the end of the war was happy or planned. Some liberated countries were lost. The great sadness of this loss echoes down to our own time in the streets of Warsaw, Prague, and East Berlin. Soviet troops that came to the center of this continent did not leave when peace came. They're still there, uninvited, unwanted, unyielding, almost 40 years after the war. Because of this, Allied forces still stand on this continent. Today, as 40 years ago, our armies are here for only one purpose--to protect and defend democracy. The only territories we hold are memorials like this one and graveyards where our heroes rest.</p>

<p>We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect the peace than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent. </p>

<p>But we try always to be prepared for peace; prepared to deter aggression; prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms; and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever. </p>

<p>It's fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II: 20 million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the Earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.</p>

<p>We will pray forever that some day that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it. </p>

<p>We are bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We're bound by reality. The strength of America's allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe's democracies. We were with you then; we are with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.</p>

<p>Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee.'' </p>

<p>Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their value [valor], and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died. </p>

<p>Thank you very much, and God bless you all.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Obama Meeting with Clinton at This Hour...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/obama_meeting_with_clinton_at.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=593" title="Obama Meeting with Clinton at This Hour..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.593</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-06T03:38:39Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-06T03:38:31Z</updated>
    
    <summary>From MSNBC.com: WASHINGTON - Hillary Rodham Clinton met late Thursday with Barack Obama, a day after saying she would end her quest for the Democratic nomination and endorse the Illinois senator. A senior Obama campaign official confirmed to NBC News...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Hillary Clinton" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24993082/">MSNBC.com</a>:</p>

<blockquote>WASHINGTON - Hillary Rodham Clinton met late Thursday with Barack Obama, a day after saying she would end her quest for the Democratic nomination and endorse the Illinois senator. </blockquote>

<blockquote>A senior Obama campaign official confirmed to NBC News that Obama delayed his departure from Washington Thursday night to meet with Clinton at her home here. </blockquote>

<p>That meeting is going on still at this hour.</p>

<p>*thinks*</p>

<p>Do you think it's a <em>booty call</em>??  ;)</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Be Careful What You Wish For...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/be_careful_what_you_wish_for.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=592" title="Be Careful What You Wish For..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.592</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-06T03:33:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-06T03:34:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, accused organizer and mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, stood in a courtroom today and told a military judge in a Guantanamo Bay courtroom that he wants the death penalty for his crimes--so he can be...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="September 11" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p align="center">
<img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/ksm.jpg" width="264" height="248" />
</p>

<p>Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080605/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/guantanamo_sept11_trial">accused organizer and mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks</a>, stood in a courtroom today and told a military judge in a Guantanamo Bay courtroom that he wants the death penalty for his crimes--so he can be <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/05/guantanamo.arraignments/index.html">martyred</a>.  </p>

<blockquote>All five also rejected representation by the team of lawyers assigned to defend them, saying they recognized only Islamic law. </blockquote>

<blockquote>Mohammed also said he wanted to be martyred.</blockquote>

<blockquote>The judge, Marine Col. Ralph Kohlmann, asked Mohammed numerous times whether he understood that he faces the death penalty.</blockquote> 

<blockquote>"That is what I wish. I wish to be martyred," he said.</blockquote>

<p>If that's what this <em>son of a bitch</em> wants then, I say: </p>

<p><strong>Grant.</strong><br />
<strong>Him.</strong><br />
<strong>His.</strong><br />
<strong>Wish.</strong></p>

<p>If he desires to meet Allah so badly, then I'd <em>love</em> for us to arrange the meeting for him and his four other co-defendants.  It's what they <em>deserve</em> for the murder of over 3000 people.</p>

<p>Will it make them martyrs?  Probably.  Anything other than their release to freedom makes the martyrs to their al Qaeda bretheren and their radical Islamofacist beliefs.  We can't be concerned about how this is going to play with radical Muslims.  We need to be concerned with justice being served.  Period.</p>

<p>The world will be a much better place without these five pieces of sub-human flotsam.</p>

<p><em>Grant their wish.</em></p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Sex and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/sex_and_the_kingdom_of_the_cry.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=591" title="Sex and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.591</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-02T00:31:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-02T01:43:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary>So, my girlfriend and I went to the movies twice in the last seven days. (Who says that people spend less on entertainment in this economy?) On Monday, I saw Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. I...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Pop-Culture" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>So, my girlfriend and I went to the movies twice in the last seven days.  (Who says that people spend less on entertainment in this economy?)</p>

<p>On Monday, I saw <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em>.  I hated it.  No...I <em>f***ing</em> <strong>hated</strong> it.  I hated it to the point where I think I like <em>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom</em> better.  That's how much I hated that movie.</p>

<p>Today, we saw <em>Sex and the City</em>.  I liked it more...<em><strong>infinitely</strong></em> more.</p>

<p>I can hear my friend <a href="http://weholdthesetruthsblog.com/">Dave</a> now...using a quote from <em>The 40 Year-Old Virgin</em>: "Dude, know how I know you're gay??"</p>

<p>Although, if <em>Sex and the City</em> had aliens in it, I'd have hated that, too.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Raucous Dischord...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/06/raucous_dischord.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=590" title="Raucous Dischord..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.590</id>
    
    <published>2008-06-01T18:48:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-01T23:48:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Sometimes, the best entertainment is completely free. For the last several months, I&apos;ve been able to sit back and watch as the Democrat party has just imploded upon itself. Yesterday, it culminated in a deal which pretty much guarantees Barack...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Barack Obama" />
            <category term="Democrats" />
            <category term="Elections" />
            <category term="Hillary Clinton" />
            <category term="John McCain" />
            <category term="Liberals" />
            <category term="Senate/House" />
            <category term="Washington" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, the best entertainment is <em>completely</em> free.</p>

<p>For the last several months, I've been able to sit back and watch as the Democrat party has just imploded upon itself.  Yesterday, it culminated in a deal which pretty much guarantees Barack H. Obama's status as the presumptive nominee of the Dems.</p>

<p>As a result, the Hillary supporters are on fire.  In fact, if the video below is any indication, they may be ready to detonate what I like to call a "political suitcase nuke" and ensure the election of John McCain to the Presidency of the United States of America.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KACQuZVAE3s&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KACQuZVAE3s&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>(If you are unable to see the embedded tirade above, please click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KACQuZVAE3s">here</a>.)</p>

<p>Why is Harriet Christian fired up?  Yesterday, the DNC Rules & Bylaws Committee met to consider the matter of seating the delegates to Florida and Michigan to the national party convention this summer in Denver.  Earlier this year, the DNC had decided that delegates in those states would not be seated because they broke the rules in scheduling their primary contests.  This has been a source of contention for the Clinton campaign because Hillary won both states handily.  (Barack H. Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan.)</p>

<p>So, in a compromise, the Rules & Bylaws Committee decided to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates to the convention---but their votes would only counted as half a vote instead of counting as a full vote.  </p>

<p>In all practicality, it hands Obama the nomination.</p>

<p>DNC officials are chanting the mantra that the party can now start to unify and heal, but many of the rank and file are not interested in a big group hug.</p>

<p>From <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D910TUN80&show_article=1">Breitbart.com</a>:</p>

<blockquote>"There's been a lot of talk about party unity--let's all come together, and put our arms around each other," said Ickes, who is also a member of the Rules Committee that approved the deal. "I submit to you ladies and gentlemen, hijacking four delegates...is not a good way to start down the path of party unity."</blockquote>

<blockquote>...</blockquote>

<blockquote>"How can you call yourselves Democrats if you don't count the vote?" one man in the audience shouted before being escorted out by security. "This is not the Democratic Party!"</blockquote>

<blockquote>...</blockquote>

<blockquote>"Lipstick on a pig!" one shouted. </blockquote>

<blockquote>"We just blew the election!" a woman in the audience shouted. The crowd was divided between cheering Obama supporters and booing Clinton supporters.</blockquote> 

<blockquote>"This isn't unity! Count all the votes!" another audience member yelled.</blockquote>

<p>How can this be?  The Democrats are the party of <em>inclusion</em>--the party that counts <em>every</em> vote and makes every vote <u>count</u>...  Since 2000, all anyone has heard is how the RIGHT steals elections or how the RIGHT discriminates or how the RIGHT is in turmoil.</p>

<p>Well, all I can say to that is, "Someone get me some popcorn because this has the potential to be a political civil war."</p>

<p>I'm not naive.  I know that a significant number of Democrats are going to unite behind Barack H. Obama as the party nominee.  Just as a large number of disenfranchised conservatives will line up to vote for John McCain so, too, will Democrats vote for Obama.  That's just the way it is.</p>

<p>The question now becomes this: will there be a significant enough number of what I now like to call "Splinter Cell Democrats" willing to rend their own party asunder just to spite the DNC and the Obama campaign?</p>

<p>I think that answer is a <em>resounding</em> "yes."</p>

<p>If there is any lesson to be taken away from the last couple of elections, it's that electoral votes matter.  In 2000, Bush won by a margin of 5 electoral votes.  Five.  That's it.  Can the Splinter Cell Dems do enough damage to give McCain a win?  You bet they can.  We most likely won't have to wait until November to see them in action, however.</p>

<p>Big surprise here: more than anything in the world, Hillary Clinton wants to be President and, if she <em>can't</em> be in 2008, she wants Barack H. Obama to fail miserably so the can then run in 2012.  She may not have succeeded this time around, but she'll do as much damage to him as she can on the way out of the spotlight.  </p>

<p>What does that mean?  It means a ground war all the way to the convention in Denver this August.  She can appeal any decision made by the committee there--and you can bet that as long as she stays in this race and doesn't take a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/democrats/2058907/US-Elections-Hillary-Clinton-to-be-offered-dignified-exit.html">negotiated exit</a>, that will most certainly be her plan.</p>

<p>There are those planning to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt6gVO8MB30">protest the Democrat National Convention</a> in such a way that it rivals the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention">1968 convention in Chicago</a>: unrest, riot police, fire hoses, etc.  They may have some competition inside the Pepsi Center because the delegate floor has the makings of being a WWE-style steel-cage grudge match for the title.</p>

<p>"The whole world is watching," indeed.</p>

<p>In the meantime, John McCain gets to sit back and wait...and watch.  The Democrats are doing an effective job of neutering themselves and he doesn't have to spend the money or the time doing it himself.  In fact, he may be the largest benefactor of the Clinton strategy, because it just might help him win the Presidency.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Memorial Day 2008...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/05/memorial_day_2008.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=589" title="Memorial Day 2008..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.589</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-28T04:05:56Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-29T12:57:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Some of you might recall that four years ago, I wound up attending the smallest Memorial Day parade I&apos;ve ever seen here in New Hampshire. It was no longer than five minutes in length and I thought it was one...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Liberals" />
            <category term="Memorial Day" />
            <category term="Military" />
            <category term="Support The Troops" />
            <category term="War on Terror" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some of you might recall that four years ago, I wound up attending the <a href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2004/05/the_biggest_little_memorial_da_1.php">smallest Memorial Day parade</a> I've ever seen here in New Hampshire.  It was no longer than five minutes in length and I thought it was one of the best parades I've ever seen.</p>

<p>This year, my girlfriend and I went to the Memorial Day parade here in Manchester--New Hampshire's Queen City.  I marched in this parade as a Cub Scout more than thirty years ago and I watched the parade from near the same spot my parents watched me from in the 1970s.</p>

<div style="width:480px; text-align: center;"><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" src="http://w291.photobucket.com/pbwidget.swf?pbwurl=http://w291.photobucket.com/albums/ll294/conblog/2b738b8c.pbw" height="360" width="480"><a href="http://i291.photobucket.com/redirect/album?action=slideshow&landing=/slideshows&type=3" target="_blank"><img src="http://pic.photobucket.com/slideshows/btn.gif" style="float:left;border-width: 0;" ></a><a href="http://s291.photobucket.com/albums/ll294/conblog/?action=view&current=2b738b8c.pbw" target="_blank"><img src="http://pic.photobucket.com/slideshows/btn_viewallimages.gif" style="float:left;border-width: 0;" ></a></div>

<p>It was a beautiful day and there wasn't a cloud to be seen.  We arrived early--and that's because the starting time printed everywhere was an hour early.  Once the parade got going, though, it was well worth the wait.</p>

<p>Marching bands, veterans, scouts...even roller girls.  They all turned out to march in this parade on a day dedicated to commemorating our honored dead.</p>

<p>They weren't alone, however.  Also in the parade were representatives from Veterans for Peace.  </p>

<p>At first it appeared that they were just as they claimed--people who had served in our Armed Forces who were advocates for peace.  That, however, was not their agenda.  What they were really marching for was the opportunity to protest the war in Iraq.</p>

<p>The signs were plain as day: "SUPPORT THE TROOPS - END THE WAR."</p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/manchvfp001.jpg" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/manchvfp002.jpg" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/manchvfp003.jpg" /></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/images/manchvfp004.jpg" /></p>

<p>When the parade slowed down and took a temporary stop, it just so happened that the Veterans for Peace were directly in front of me and my girlfriend.  While she was taking pictures for me (which you can see here in this post in the slide show and photos above), I took the only action I could deem appropriate...</p>

<p>I turned my back on the Veterans for Peace in protest of their actions.</p>

<p>That was not an easy decision for me.  I mean, these were people who served this country and I don't take that service lightly.  Those men gave something of themselves in the defense of this nation.  It was not an easy decision, but it was the best way for me to send my message--and I'm certain they got the message.</p>

<p>I'm all for freedom of speech.  I really am.  However, Memorial Day is supposed to be a solemn remembrance.  It's supposed to honor those who have paid the ultimate price in defending the United States. </p>

<p>It is NOT a day for politics.  There are no Republicans and no Democrats in those graves--there are only <em>heroes</em>.  I'm all for the Veterans marching in the parade, but they should have left their protest signs at home.  There was no place for them in this parade and I was appalled.</p>

<p>Memorial Day isn't about Iraq.  It's not about Vietnam or Afghanistan or any other war that people may or may not agree with.  It's about our American brothers and sisters who didn't make it back and, at the very least, they deserve a day free of politics because it's our duty to remember their sacrifices.  It doesn't matter if they served in the Revolutionary War or at Iwo Jima or in the War on Terror.  </p>

<p>The Veterans for Peace were a cancer in that wonderful parade yesterday and they, more than anyone, should know better.</p>

<p>At least <em>they</em> made it back.</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
ConservativeBlogger.com</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Border: The Movie...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/archives/2008/05/border_the_movie.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=588" title="Border: The Movie..." />
    <id>tag:www.conservativeblogger.com,2008://1.588</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-07T22:03:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T22:07:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary>[Note: This is completely unsoliicted and I found out about this movie while listening to Glenn Beck today. This is not a paid advertisement and I have received no compensation of any form from the producers/distributors of this documentary for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>William Smith</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Illegal Immigration" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conservativeblogger.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>[<strong>Note</strong>: This is completely unsoliicted and I found out about this movie while listening to Glenn Beck today. This is not a paid advertisement and I have received no compensation of any form from the producers/distributors of this documentary for writing about this movie.]</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.bordermovie.com/index.php">BORDER</a> is a new movie available on DVD which takes a look at the problem of illegal immigration along our southern border.  </p>

<p>Watching the trailer alone has compelled me to order the DVD. Illegal immigration is a significant threat to this nation and BORDER makes it all too clear.</p>

<blockquote>BORDER is a must-see documentary about the serious and dangerous problems the nation is facing due to unsecure and porous borders. Using footage obtained over the course of a month on the southern border of the US covering four states, BORDER reveals the cause and effects on the people on both sides of the issue.  With the help of ranchers, illegal immigrants, politicians, artivists, and Minutemen Civil Defense Corps volunteers, the situation is revealed to its audience in devestatingly raw form.  The nation should be worried and offended.</blockquote> 

<blockquote>California filmmaker Chris Burgard's award-winning, feature-length documentary, BORDER, takes a firsthand look at the dire and real human consequences of America's failure to secure its borders. BORDER unleashes a haunting, inside look at what has arguably become a war zone: rape trees, illegal immigration, drug smuggling, sex trafficking, Mexican military incursions and more--all taking place at the United States' southern border. From drug cartels and smuggler towns to besieged American ranchers routinely finding corpses on their properties, BORDER gives the viewer a front row seat.</blockquote>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Av7qVFFegUo&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Av7qVFFegUo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>(If you are unable to see the movie trailer embedded above, please click <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Av7qVFFegUo">here</a>.)</p>

<p>William Smith<br />
<strong>ConservativeBlogger.com</strong></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

